Phil 327 – Ethics in the Information Age --Spring, 2023 

Metropolitan State University

 

Syllabus

 

Position Paper Assignments (Note: these are carried over from last semester. They probably won't change much, if at all, but check back to make sure you have the current version.)

 

 First Position Paper Assignment (Due Friday, February 24 by 10 AM)

 

Second Position Paper Assignment (Due Friday, April 7 by 10AM)

 

Third Position Paper Assignment (Due Wednesday, May 3, by 10AM)

Philosophy paper writing guides (relevant more to Position Papers #2 and#3 than to #1): 

from Jim Pryor of NYU

from Joe Cruz of Williams College

 


Schedule of assignments
Date Topic Reading (to be completed before class) Writing Due Handouts - in class stuff
Jan. 9 Introduction none None. Cases for Discussion;
Discussion Project: Identifying Ethical Issues
Jan. 16 No Class Martin Luther King Holiday    
Jan. 23 Overview: Personal, Professional, and Social Issues in Information Technology

1. The Case of the Killer Robot (online here) -- a fictional story, told as a series of imaginary newpaper articles, intended to raise a number of ethical and techncal issues.

2. Benkler, Wealth of Networks, Chapter 1, "Introduction: A moment of Opportunity and Challenge" -- [Note: you may safely skip the section called "Four Methodological Comments," but do read the section that comes after it, called "The Stakes of It All.]

Benkler's book, published in 2006, laid out an optimistic vision of the ways that the internet could make life better. But the chapter ends with a warning -- these good things will not happen if the companies that profit from the old 'industrial' information system are allowed to write the rules for the new technologies. Fifteen years later, who won the battle?

Choose your format:

a. online here - HTML formatted with lots of white space for easy reading (but who picked this font?)

b. or here - PDF formated for saving paper when printing (18 pages)

c. or here - formatted to match the original printed version of the book (31 pages)

There is a PDF of the whole book online here.

3. Quinn, Ethics for the Information Age, Chapter 1 (Optional - read this if you have time and interest after doing the other readings);. [Note: this is our class textbook, available at the University bookstore in printed and electronic editions.]

Response to Readings Discussion Project: Killer Robot

Jan. 30

 

Ethical Theories 1: Relativism, Religion, Kant

1. Quinn, Chapter 2, the first six sections, through p. 71; 
2. Excerpts from Kant (with notes);

Response to Readings

Discussion Project: Applying Kant; Cases for Discussion

First Position Paper Assignment

Feb.6 Ethical Theories 2: Utilitarianism, Social Contract theory 1. Quinn, Chapter 2, the rest (but skip section 10 on virtue ethics for now);

Response to Readings

Discussion Project: Applying Utilitarianism; Cases for Discussion;
Notes on Rawls on Justice

How to make a chart like a utilitarian

Feb. 13 Professional/Business ethics 1: responsibilities, standards, codes 1. Quinn, Chapter 2, section 10 on Virtue Ethics, (pp. 87-92 in the printed version);
2. Quinn, Chapter 9, the first five sections on the concept of a profession and the Sofware Engineering Code of Ethics, (through p. 462 in the printed version)
Response to Readings

Discussion Project:Applying the Software Engineering Code of Ethics; Cases for Discussion

First Position Paper Assignment

Feb. 20 Professional/Business ethics 2: whistleblowing and loyalty

1. Quinn, Chapter 9, the rest (i.e., section 9.6 on whistleblowing);
2. "Illusions of whistleblower protection" by Brian Martin,
3. Brian Martin's summary of Robert Jackall's discussion of whistleblowing;

4. Summary of Jackall's book "Moral Mazes" (pdf) by Damian Grace, University of New South Wales

Response to Readings;

First Position Paper due by 10am Friday, Feb. 24

Discussion Project on Whistleblowing
Feb.27 What is the Internet (and especially social media) doing to our brains and our lives?

1. Quinn, Chapter 3, sections 1, 3, 4, and 10 (skip section 2 on spam, or read it if you have time and interest; we'll read the remaining sections (5 through 9) next week);

2. Nicholas Carr,   "The Platform Is the Conversation" (Carr is the author of The Shallows: What the Internet is Doing To Our Brains. Here he is responding to the news from a few years ago that Facebook ran experiments on the emotional psychology of its users.)

3. Nat Eliason, The Destructive Switch from Search to Social

4. Andrew Sullivan on Internet addiction: I Used To Be a Human Being (I'm putting this last, even though I think it's one of the best, because it is rather long. Maybe you won't have time, but I hope you will.)

Response to Readings;

First Position Paper due by 10am Friday, February 24;

Discussion project on Facebook whistleblower

Facebook whistleblower video

March 6 No Class Spring Break    
March 13 Free Speech, Censorship and related issues

1. Quinn, Chapter 3, sections 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9;

The three selections that follow represent a sample of the kind of arguments and recommendations made by public interest advocacy groups about how best to preserve freedom of speech on the Internet.

2. "CDA 230: The Most Important Law Protecting Internet Speech" from the Electronic Frontier Foundation

3. Testimony on proposed legislation to reform Section 230 from the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC)

4. Recommendations from the Center for Countering Digital Hate:

 

If you can possibly find the time, please also check out these recent news stories:

First two brief discussions of a case alleging that Google subsidiary YouTube is partly responsible for a deadly terrorist attack, now before US Supreme Court

  1. "Will SCOTUS Overturn This 1996 Law Governing the Internet?"
  2. "The Supreme Court's Big Algorithm Fail" both from Mother Jones Magazine

  3. How hate speech is handled in Germany: “Where Online Hate Speech Can Bring the Police to Your Door” - from the New York Times.
  1. https://techpolicy.press/new-study-identifies-dynamics-of-stop-the-steal-images-on-twitter/ Does this mean that content moderation can never work well?

 

Response to Readings

Second Paper Assignment handed out;

Discussion Project on Regulating Online Content

March 20 Privacy 1 - What is privacy and why is it important? -- private sector policies and practices 1. Quinn, Chapter 5, "Information Privacy";
2. MSNBC article on privacy law
Response to Readings

Discussion project on privacy;

The privacy rules adopted by the European Union

March 27 Privacy 2 - Privacy and the Government

1. Quinn, Chapter 6, "Privacy and the Government";

2. Privacy scholar Daniel Solove takes on the claim that people with “nothing to hide” need not worry about government surveillance and data-aggregation:
https://teachprivacy.com/the-nothing-to-hide-argument-my-essays-10th-anniversary/

3. Solove answers some other pro-surveillance arguments:
https://www.salon.com/2011/05/31/solove_privacy_security/

plus whatever else you have time for from the articles listed on this page

Response to Readings Discussion project on Surveillance
April 3 Ethical issues with Artificial Intelligence

There’s a lot here to read, I know, but most of these pieces are short, some very short.

  1. An overview of AI ethics issues in the form of a profile of Timnit Gebru, a computer scientist/ethicist who was fired from Google a couple of years ago.
  2. Here’s what smart people were worrying about a few years ago (mostly discrimination built into algorithms)
  3. The new new thing, A brief introduction to ChatGPT-type AI and its problems (from Wired magazine). 
  4. Breaking news!  Tech leaders call for a moratorium on further development of AI in an open letter signed by more than a thousand researchers and techies.
  5. Some prominent advocates of “humane tech” also recently sounded the alarm.
  6. And already (just hit my inbox this afternoon) a smart critique of the open letter from two Princeton University computer scientists
  7. Ezra Klein of the New York Times says the problem is not the tech as much as it is the business models
  8. This brief Twitter thread from a Daily Beast columnist describes concisely the kind of regulatory apparatus that I think we need to put in place to govern our digital world.

    The rest is optional extras:
  9. [Optional!!!}  If you want an understandable but much more detailed explanation of how tools like ChatGPT work, here’s one from physicist/computer scientist Stephen Wolfram.  AKA: more than you ever wanted to know about how these things actually work.
  10. [Optional!!!]  Want to know what the Biden administration is thinking about these issues?  Here you go: https://www.whitehouse.gov/ostp/ai-bill-of-rights/
  11. [For further study]  A list of articles, books, etc., that might guide further study of AI ethics issues:  https://irisvanrooijcogsci.com/2023/01/29/critical-lenses-on-ai/ 



Response to Readings;

 

Second Position Paper due by 10am Friday, April 7

Discusion Project: Ethical Principals for AI

April 10 Intellectual Property

1.   Quinn, Chapter 4 "Intellectual Property" -- If you have time and interest, read the whole chapter.  If not read at least:

a. Section 4.2 "Intellectual Property Rights" (pp. 167-173),

b. Section 4.3.4 "Copyrights" (pp. 176-179),

c. Section 4.4 "Fair Use" (pp. 184-191),

d. Sections 4.8 "Legitimacy of I.P. Protection for Software", 4.9 "Open-Source Software", and 4.10 "Creative Commons" (pp.208-217)

2. Richard Stallman, Misinterpreting Copyright—A Series of Errors

(You might also be interested in Stallman’s critique of the very concept of “Intellectual Property” – but this is optional.)

3. links to further (optional) materials on copyright from Yochai Benkler's book The Wealth of Networks - read some of this if you have time and interest.

Response to Readings

Second Position Paper due by 10am Friday, April 7;

Larry Lessig's TED talk;


Discussion project on Copyright

April 17 Access, Equity, and Work

1. Quinn, Chapter 10, “Work and Wealth”

2. Daron Acemoglu, “AI's Future Doesn't Have to Be Dystopian" (Optional: If you had time to read some of the replies to this essay that can be found at the top and bottom of the article, that would be great.)

[Note: Some of the ideas in this essay will also be relevant the topic we will take up nest week: the effect of information technology and the internet on politics and democracy.]


Response to Readings

 

DP- steering AI

April 24

The Internet and Democracy

 

 

 

Some blame the internet for polarization and misinformation in our society:

1. “The Daily Me" by Cass Sunstein (From his book #Republic: Divided Democracy in the Age of Social Media)

2. Sunstein on Group Polarization and Cybercascades

[Optional: If you like watching and listening to people talk instead of reading, or if you just like to get a better sense of what a writer is like,  here’s a talk that Cass Sunstein gave (virtually) to an audience in Chile last October, going over much the same set of ideas that he wrote about in his book. 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2ay_DJGs_cc&list=UUKSa9-lO2UlFNEvkyW-GpEA  ]

3. An example from the Facebook files: https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/facebook-knew-radicalized-users-rcna3581

But others blame increasingly propagandistic broadcast media (like Fox News):

4. "Selling Outrage" Deborah Chasman interviews our old friend Yochai Benkler. This interview begins with his diagnosis of the roots of these problems.  About halfway through, the conversation turns to the question of what to do: Benkler's focus is on how to improve journalistic practices to make it harder for misinformation and propaganda to spread. 

5. Philosopher C. Thi Nguyen tries to sort it out: https://bostonreview.net/articles/polarization-or-propaganda/

6. "Understanding Social Media Algorithms" by Arvind Narayanan. A deep dive into the history and nature of the kind of recomendation algoriths found on social media platforms and some anlysis of their effects. If you have time for only part of this article, read at least the sections called "Three Types of Information Propagation", "The Core of the Algorithm is Engagement Prediction", "How Engagement Optimization Fails Users, Creators, and Society", "Algorithms Are anot the Enemy", and "Concluding Thoughts".

[Optional extra stuff: If you want to dive even deeper into the literature on this question, the references in Narayana's article provide a good start, and here is a roundup of papers and studies put together by Joanna Bryson, a professor of Ethics and Technology at the Hertie School of Governance in Berlin.]


Response to Readings

Discussion Project on the Internet and Democracy

Benkler Notes

Third Paper

Law journal article on the Fairness Doctrine

May 1 Wrap Up; Course evaluations
  1. Software designer Tobias van Schneider on design ethics:  "The Art of Being a Hypocrite Designer"

  2. Salkever and Wadwa. "How Design Can Make Tech Products Less Addictive" (Don't neglect to click the button labeled "Story continues" to get the second half of the article.)

  3. Check out the website of Tristan Harris' Center for Humane Technology. Start here:
    a. Key issues
    b. Then check out this page: Solutions Overview
    c. and this one: Policy Principles
    (This page has numerous headers that expand into more detailed explanations and examples when you click on them.) There's a lot more on the site, if you want to look further.

Response to readings

Third Paper due by 10am on Wednesday, May 3

 

Story of Stuff videos: Stuff in general; Electronic stuff