Syllabus                                                          Professor Tom Atchison 
Ethics in the Information Age                      Office:  312 St. John’s Hall (St. Paul Campus) - given the parking situation, I will seldom be in my office
PHIL 327-01                                                  Office hours: Tuesday's before class at Midway and by appointment
Summer Semester 2014                                    Office Phone: 651-793-1493
                                                                      Email: Thomas.Atchison@metrostate.edu
                                                                      (Email is the best way to get a quick response.)                                                                    
Course Objectives:

1.  To learn the basic concepts and methods of several approaches to ethics and to see how these may be used to think about moral problems connected to information technology. 

2.  To get better at analyzing and evaluating decisions, institutions, policies and issues from an ethical point of view by:

a. Learning something about the history of laws, policies, and practices
b. Becoming more familiar with the positions people have developed to address these issues and the arguments for and against those positions
c. Practicing the skills involved in defending and criticizing your own and others ideas about what practices, policies, decisions, etc. would be best.

Topics:  Privacy, surveillance, and the control of information; intellectual property, copyright and the open-source ethic; ethical obligations of IT professionals with respect to security, reliability, safety, usability, etc; spam, porn, and the ethics of mass communication; political and social significance (if any) of ‘the internet revolution’.

Texts:

Ethics for the Information Age, sixth edition, by Michael J. Quinn   
(If you buy this book online or anywhere besides the Metro State bookstore, be sure you have the sixth edition.)

Other readings will be photocopied and handed out in class or will be available on the Internet.  Many assignments for this class will require access to the Internet and the ability to read significant amounts of online material.  Metro State provides access in its computer labs and library as do public libraries.  It is your responsibility to make sure your home access is adequate or to make time to do your reading at school or a library.  Occasionally I will ask you to print out an online text and bring it to class.  (It was either that or order several more books.)

Class website:  I maintain my own website (not part of D2L) where I post course handouts and information at:  http://www.woldww.net/classes/.   The online course readings will be linked here.  Bookmark this site and consult it frequently. It is your best source of up-to-date information about this class.

Please make sure your Metro State email account is working and check regularly for class related emails

Please bring the assigned readings to class each week

 

Coursework

 Please keep copies of all the work you hand in.

Reading assignments
I expect you to find time (several hours) to do the reading for each class and to come prepared to discuss it.  Come to class ready to say what you found interesting, what you found confusing, silly, or just plain wrong, what seemed to you to be the most important claims made, and what arguments or justifications were offered for those claims.

Reading response papers

            20 % of your grade will be earned by submitting brief (1-2 pages, typed, double-spaced) responses to the readings for each class.  These must be turned in at the beginning of the class period or emailed to me before class to get full credit.  Late response papers will earn half credit.  (If you must miss class, send in your response paper by e-mail.) They can contain questions, objections, observations and/or reactions to the reading for that class.  I will not grade these (or even return them consistently), but I will reject any that do not seem to be based on a reasonably conscientious reading of the assignment for that week.  You can miss one or two of these and still earn an ‘A’ for this part of the course work, but missing more will be penalized on the following schedule: 85% completed = A; 70% = B; 60% = C; 50% = D; less than 50% = F.  I will also notice and reward particularly perceptive or thoughtful response papers.

Position Papers
At approximately 5 week intervals you will be asked to submit a 4-6 page position paper explaining and defending your position on some ethical question or issue connected to the topics we have studied in the preceding third of the course.  See the schedule of assignments for due dates.  Detailed instructions for each assignment will be handed out later.

Class discussion
Most weeks we will have guided small group discussion projects.  The purpose of these projects is to open discussion and to focus it on particular issues. They are also intended to be "mini-labs" in which to practice the skills of careful reading and evaluation of reasoning.  The projects are done in class in groups of 3-5 and take roughly 20-45 minutes to complete.  Each group should keep notes on its discussion, sign the notes and hand them in at the end of each class session.  Often groups will also report orally on their discussions.
If you miss a discussion project, you should get hold of the instructions, write out responses to the questions on your own, and hand them in as soon as you can.  10% of your grade will be determined by the number of discussion projects you complete satisfactorily (on the same schedule as the response papers above.)
10% of your grade will also be determined by my evaluation of the quality of your participation in class discussions.  Just showing up and paying attention earns a C for this component; occasionally making helpful contributions earns a B; regularly making helpful contributions earns an A.  Helpful contributions include: asking pertinent questions, answering questions asked by the instructor or by other students, expressing your views about the texts or topics we are discussing, responding (relevantly and respectfully) to the views expressed by others.

Groundrules for class discussion       
In my view, high quality class discussion is informed  by careful reading of assigned texts, respectful  of the other participants, relevant  to the issues we are trying to discuss and thoughtful  in that points are made or questions are raised that help us move toward greater understanding.  I believe the following guidelines help foster this kind of discussion:

 

Grading criteria
I try hard to base my evaluation of your work on your understanding of the reading, the quality of your reasoning and questioning, and the clarity and effectiveness of your expression of your thoughts, not on whether I agree with your ethical ideas and positions.

Time commitment outside of class
In accordance with Metropolitan State University guidelines, I've designed this course with the expectation that students will do 2-3 hours of course-related work outside of class for every hour spent in class.  In other words, you should expect to spend 6-9 hours a week outside of class working on this course. 

Needed reading and writing skills
Although there are no prerequisites for this course, it is an upper-division course.  This means I assume you have the following reading and writing skills, and assignments are made with this expectation in mind:

If you do not have these skills, it will be difficult for you to earn a good grade in this class.

 

 

Course Policies

                       
Disability Services

Metropolitan State University offers reasonable accommodations to qualified students with documented disabilities. If you have a disability that may require accommodations it is essential that you be registered with the Disability Services Office.  You may contact the Disability Services Office, at Founders Hall, Room 221, St. Paul Campus or (651) 793-1549, or email Disability.Services@metrostate.edu  For additional information on Disability Services, please visit:  http://www.metrostate.edu/msweb/pathway/academic_success/disability/index.html  

Attendance
I do not require attendance per se, but part of your grade is determined by discussion projects and general class discussion.  So, when you are in class, contribute to the discussion and please be sure your name is on your small group's discussion report and that the report gets turned in.  When you miss a class, get the instructions for the discussion project, write out answers on your own and turn them in.  I strongly advise regular attendance (and prompt completion of missed discussion projects), because the material in this course is relatively difficult and confusing, and few students are able to do well on the position papers without the explanations and practice provided in class.

 

Late work
All papers must be turned in at (or before) the beginning of class to receive full credit.  Late response papers will receive half credit. In fairness to students who turn their position papers in on time, I will subtract one grade (e.g., B+ to B) for each day that a position paper is late.  A paper that is turned in or emailed during or after class on the date due is considered to be late.

 

Incompletes
I will give incomplete grades only to students who have satisfactorily completed most of the course work and who are unable to finish on time because of circumstances beyond their control.

 

Plagiarism
All work submitted for this course must be your own.  Plagiarism is the academic ‘sin’ of presenting someone else’s work as your own.  It is plagiarism if you copy something verbatim (word for word) from a published source, from the Internet, or from another student.  It is still plagiarism if you rearrange, paraphrase, condense, or summarize someone else’s work without making clear to your reader what is your contribution and what is taken from your source. If the exact wording comes from your source, then use quotation marks.  If the idea comes from someone else, give him or her credit for it. The way to do this is to cite your sources.  There is a clear and detailed explanation of various forms of plagiarism and of proper citation practices at http://clover.slavic.pitt.edu/~tales/02-1/plagiarism.htmlI will give a grade of ‘F’ to any student who submits plagiarized work for this course.   

 

Drop date, Tuition Refunds, and Academic Standing
Withdrawing from courses after the drop deadline (Sunday, May 18) will result in a ‘W’ on your record and may bring your completion rate below the ratio required to remain in  good academic standing (66.66%).  It will also eliminate any possibility of a refund of the tuition you have paid and this may have an impact on your financial aid.  My advice is to determine quickly whether or not this is the right course for you and to drop before that deadline (just a few days away), if it is not.  This is an academically demanding class with a relatively heavy schedule of reading and writing assignments.  In addition many of the readings are relatively difficult.  If your reading and writing skills are not up to this challenge, or if you do not have 6-9 hours per week to devote to completing these assignments, I urge you to drop this class before May 18, so you can get your money back and avoid jeopardizing your financial aid.

 

Phil 327 – Summer, 2014 – Tentative schedule of topics and readings, check website for changes and additions.   (The schedule of writing assignments is firm.  Links to online readings are at:  www.woldww.net/classes/)

Date

Topic

Reading

Writing assignments

 

 

 

 

May 13

Introduction

none

 

May 20

Overview: Personal, Professional, and Social Issues in Information Technology

Quinn, Chapter 1;  Benkler, Wealth of Networks, Introduction (online); The Case of the Killer Robot (online)

Response to reading

May 27

Ethical Theories 1

Quinn, Chapter 2, the first 6 sections, through p. 72; Excerpts from Kant (online); LaFollette on relativism (online)

Response to reading

June 3

Ethical Theories 2

Quinn, Chapter 2, the rest (but skip section 10 on virtue ethics for now; Singer and Blumen (online)

Response to reading

June 10

Professional/Business ethics 1: responsibilities, standards, codes

Quinn, Chapter 2, section 10, pp. 89-94; Chapter 9, the first five sections, through p. 430

Response to reading

June 17

Professional/Business ethics 2: whistleblowing, loyalty

Quinn, Chapter 9, the rest; Ravishankar, Martin and Jackall on Whistleblowing (online)

1st Paper due;

Response to reading

June 24

Computer Security and Reliability

From Quinn, Chapter 7: the first three sections, through page 335); Chapter 8: the first four sections and the last two (pp. 361-377 and 387-398); Principles for Fair Commerce in Digital Products

Response to reading

July 1

Spam, Pornography, Free Speech, Censorship

Quinn, Chapter 3

Response to reading

July 8

Privacy 1

Quinn, Chapter 5; MSNBC (online)

Response to reading

July 15

Privacy 2

Quinn, Chapter 6; (various online articles)

 Response to reading;

July 22

Intellectual Property 1

Quinn, Chapter 4

 Response to reading; 2nd Paper due

July 29

Intellectual Property 2

Benkler, Wealth of Networks, Chapters 2, 3, and 5

Response to reading

August 5

The Internet and Democracy

Benkler, Wealth of Networks, Chapter 7 (Chapter 6 optional); Sunstein, “The Daily We” (online)

 Response to reading

August 12

Access and Equity

Quinn, Chapter 10

Response to reading;

August 16

 

Submit third paper by email before midnight.

3rd Paper due