Phil 327 – Ethics in the Information Age -- Fall, 2021
Metropolitan State University
Syllabus (Note: this is the syllabus as it was at the beginning of the semester. Check the schedule below for changes and additions.)
Paper Assignments (Note: Unless otherwise indicated, these are carried over from last semester. Check back for updated versions before you write your papers)
First Paper Assignment Due Monday October 4 by 10:00 AM
Second Paper Assignment Due Monday, November 8 by 10:00 AM
Third Paper Assignment Due Monday, December 13 by 10:00 AM
Paper writing guides (relevant more to Position Papers #2 and#3 than to #1):
My favorite: from Jim Pryor of NYU
Might be helpful as well: from Joe Cruz of Williams College
Date | Topic | Reading (to be completed before class) | Writing Due | Handouts - in class stuff |
---|---|---|---|---|
Aug. 27 | Introduction
|
none
|
Cases for Discussion; Discussion Project: Identifying Ethical Issues |
|
Sept. 3 | Overview:
Personal, Professional, and Social Issues in Information Technology
|
1. Quinn,
Ethics for the Information Age,Chapter 1 (Optional - read this if you have time and interest after doing the other readings); |
Response to Readings | Discussion Project: Killer Robot |
Sept. 10 | Ethical
Theories 1: Relativism, Religion, Kant
|
1. Quinn,
Chapter 2, the first six sections, through p. 71; |
Response to Readings | Discussion Project: Applying Kant; Cases for Discussion |
Sept. 17 | Ethical
Theories 2: Utilitarianism, Social Contract theory
|
1. Quinn,
Chapter 2, the rest (but skip section 10 on virtue ethics for now); |
Response to Readings | Discussion Project: Applying Utilitarianism;
Notes on Rawls on Justice |
Sept. 24 | Professional/Business
ethics 1: responsibilities, standards, codes
|
1. Quinn, Chapter 2, section 10, (pp. 87-92 in the printed version); 2. Quinn, Chapter 9, the first five sections, (through p. 462 |
Response to Readings | Discussion Project:Applying the Software Engineering Code of Ethics; Cases for Discussion |
Oct. 1 | Professional/Business
ethics 2: whistleblowing and loyalty
|
1. Quinn,
Chapter 9, the rest (i.e., section 9.6); 2. "Illusions of whistleblower protection" by Brian Martin, 3. Brian Martin's summary of Robert Jackall's discussion of whistleblowing; 4. Summary of Jackall's book "Moral Mazes" (pdf) by Damian Grace, University of New South Wales |
Response to Readings; First Paper |
Discussion Project: Whistleblowing |
Oct. 8 | 1. Quinn, Chapter 3, sections 1, 3, 4, and 10 (skip section 2 on spam, or read it if you have time and interest; we'll read the remaining sections (5 through 9) next week); 2. Nicholas Carr, "The Platform Is the Conversation" (Carr is the author of The Shallows: What the Internet is Doing To Our Brains. Here he is responding to the news from a few years ago that Facebook ran experiments on the emotional psychology of its users.) 3. Nat Eliason, The Destructive Switch from Search to Social 4. Andrew Sullivan on Internet addiction: I Used To Be a Human Being (I'm putting this last, even though I think it's one of the best, because it is rather long. Maybe you won't have time, but I hope you will.) |
Response to Readings | Discussion project on Facebook whistleblower | |
Oct. 15 | Free Speech, Censorship and related issues | 1. Quinn, Chapter 3, sections 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9; 2 [Leaving this one out for now. Feel free to read it if you have the time and interest.] .
3. "CDA 230: The Most Important Law Protecting Internet Speech" from the Electronic Frontier Foundation 4. Angie Holan (Editor-in-chief of the fact-checking organization PolitiFact), "To control online misinformation, we need real-world solutions" 5. Ben Burgis (philosophy professor and podcaster), "The Left Should Oppose Censorship by Big Tech Companies" 6. Some short recent news and opinion pieces:
|
Response to Readings | Second Paper Assignment handed out |
Oct. 22 | Privacy
1
|
2. MSNBC article on privacy law |
Response to Readings |
|
Oct. 29 | Privacy
2
|
1. Quinn,
Chapter 6; 2. plus whatever you have time for from the articles listed on this page |
Response to Readings | Discussion project on Surveillance
|
Nov. 5 |
5. Racial bias in facial recognition technology: https://sitn.hms.harvard.edu/flash/2020/racial-discrimination-in-face-recognition-technology/
|
Response to Readings; Second paper due Monday November 8 by 10:00AM |
|
|
Nov. 12 | 1. Richard Stallman, Misinterpreting Copyright—A Series of Errors 2. Quinn, Chapter 4 -- If you have time and interest, read the whole chapter. If not read at least: Section 4.2 (pp. 162-169), Section 4.3.4 (pp. 172-175), Section 4.4 (pp. 179-186), Sections 4.8, 4.9, and 4.10 (pp.201-211) 3. links to further (optional) materials on copyright - read some of this if you have time and interest. |
Response to Readings | ||
Nov. 19 | Access, Equity, and Work | 1. Quinn, Chapter 10, “Work and Wealth” 2. Daron Acemoglu, “AI's Future Doesn't Have to Be Dystopian" (Optional: If you had time to read some of the replies to this essay that can be found at the top and bottom of the article, that would be great.) [Note: Some of the ideas in this essay will also be relevant the topic we will take up after the Thanksgiving break: the effect of information technology and the internet on politics and democracy.]
|
Response to Readings | |
Nov. 26 | The day before the Thanksgiving holiday | No Class | ||
Dec. 3 | The Internet and Democracy
|
Some blame the internet for polarization and misinformation in our society: 2. Sunstein on Group Polarization and Cybercascades
3. A recent example: https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/facebook-knew-radicalized-users-rcna3581 But others blame increasingly propagandistic broadcast media (like Fox News): 4. "Selling Outrage" Deborah Chasman interviews our old friend Yochai Benkler. This interview begins with his diagnosis of the roots of these problems. About halfway through, the conversation turns to the question of what to do: Benkler's focus is on how to improve journalistic practices to make it harder for misinformation and propaganda to spread. 5. Philosopher C. Thi Nguyen tries to sort it out: https://bostonreview.net/articles/polarization-or-propaganda/ 6. Some think we need to "Bring Back the Fairness Doctrine" 7. But Surveillance Capitalism author Shoshana Zuboff argues in a recent essay that we need to destroy the whole data extraction business model of 'big tech'. |
Response to Readings | |
Dec.10 | Wrap Up; Course evaluations |
|
Response to readings Third paper due Monday, December 13 by 10 am |
Story of Stuff videos: Stuff in general; Electronic stuff |