FAY
It is so much easier reading and understanding Fays material (over Kuhns) but he does evaluate claims that hold similar paths. I do appreciate how he always seems to pick the good out of the theory. I believe he does a really good job on stating his belief but also not being bias to others views as well.
I have shared lots of his viewed throughout my life.
I am sorry for I have not been very active in the posting on the blog for this class. All of the post are so well constructed and full of informative information so I comment on some but just read and learn from most. Your post are full of so much informative information!!
I agree with you on Kuhn's writing. I think most people's writing is easeir to read than his. It's unfortunate, because I think many of his thoughts are actually easily understood and if they were phrased differently, more simply but still elegantly, his (important) book might be read more widely.
I seem to have an easier time reading and understanding Kuhn's work than I do Fay's material. For some reason or another I find Kuhn to be highly interesting. I will be one to admit however, that Kuhn's views come off as being Relativistic. I do like how Fay explains his views so you can get the feel of the type of author he is. Kuhn, not so much.