Possible Exam Questions for Ethics Midterm

 

The exam will be on Friday, March 21.  You will be asked to answer about 6 of the following questions rather briefly (a third of a page) and one question at somewhat greater length (about a page).  You will be able to consult any of the course texts, but not your notes. 

 

 

1.      How does J. S. Mill try to justify his view that some pleasures are qualitatively better than others?  What do you think of this view?

2.      How does Mill answer the objection that utilitarianism is impractical, because we don’t have time to calculate the effect of our actions on the general happiness?  Does his answer succeed in rebutting the objection?

3.      How does Mill try to “prove” the principle of utility?  How successful do you think his proof is?

4.      What does it mean to call an imperative “categorical”?

5.       According to Kant there is only one Categorical Imperative (though it can be formulated in several different ways).  In plain English, explain the meaning of the so-called “universal law formulation” of the Categorical Imperative.

6.      How can the Categorical Imperative be used as a test for whether an action is morally right?  (What steps should one go through to apply this test?)  Do you think this is a good way to determine if an action is right or wrong?

7.      What does Kant mean by saying that we should regard persons as “ends-in-themselves” and not merely as means?  What do you think of this idea?

8.      How does a utilitarian approach to the problem of capital punishment differ from a Kantian approach?

9.      Explain and assess Peter Singer’s argument for the claim that people in affluent countries like the US should be doing a lot more to help feed the world’s hungry people.

10.  Why does Garret Hardin think it would be a bad idea to try to feed the world’s hungry people?  What do you think of his case?

11.  How does Robert Van Wyk think that we need to consider history in order to decide discover the extent of our obligations to feed hungry people?

12.  How does a Kantian approach to the issue of feeding the hungry differ from a utilitarian approach?

13.  What, according to Aristotle, is ‘the function’ of a human being?  How does he use this idea to define happiness for a human being (and, thus, ‘the human good’)?

14.  Briefly, what is Aristotle’s ‘doctrine of the mean’?

15.  What does Aristotle mean by saying that the mean is ‘relative to us’?  Does that mean that he thinks there is no objective right and wrong?